Most students losing marks in O-Level English have adequate grammar. The marks go elsewhere — to writing that ignores who it is addressed to, to comprehension answers that repeat the passage instead of interpreting it, and to summaries that run long or lift wholesale. Those are separate skills with separate fixes, and grammar drilling touches none of them.
Finding out which one applies is worth doing before buying anything.
The four demands, and what each rewards
Situational writing tests whether you can match register, format and content to a stated audience and purpose. A letter to a principal, a report for a committee and an email to a friend are different in tone, structure and what they include. Content points are usually specified and must all be covered. Students lose most heavily here by writing well in the wrong register — a polished informal email where a formal report was asked for scores poorly regardless of the quality of the English.
Continuous writing tests sustained composition — a coherent piece with a clear structure, held together, on the question actually set. Drift off the prompt is expensive.
Comprehension tests close reading and inference: finding what the text implies rather than states, explaining a writer’s choices, and answering in your own words. Copying a phrase from the passage that happens to contain the answer usually earns nothing.
Summary tests selection and compression — identifying the required points within a defined scope and rewriting them concisely in your own words, within a limit.
Oral tests reading aloud and spoken response — fluency, clarity, and the ability to develop an answer rather than give a one-line reply.
Sorting where the marks go
Take a marked paper and put each lost mark into one of these.
Register and format errors. Right content, wrong tone or structure for the stated audience. Very fixable — it is a checklist habit before writing, not a language skill.
Missed content points. The task specified what to include and something was left out. Also a habit fix: annotate the requirements before starting.
Inference failures. The answer restates the passage instead of interpreting it. This is the most common comprehension loss and needs practice at a specific question type, not general reading.
Summary errors. Over the word limit, lifting phrasing, or including material outside the defined scope. Concrete and quickly improvable.
Language errors. Grammar, vocabulary, sentence control. Real, and for most students a smaller share of the total than they assume.
A student whose losses concentrate in the first four piles will get very little from grammar exercises, which is what “English tuition” often defaults to.
What actually helps, by pile
For register and format: before writing, name the audience, the purpose and the format, and check the register against them. Practise the same content written for two different audiences — it makes the distinction concrete faster than any explanation.
For missed content points: underline every requirement in the prompt and tick them off after writing. Mechanical, and it recovers marks immediately.
For inference: practise on questions that ask why the writer did something, or what a phrase suggests. Answer, then check against the mark scheme’s reasoning rather than its wording. Reading widely helps over time; targeted practice helps this term.
For summary: practise to a strict word limit with strict marking. The discipline of paraphrasing rather than lifting is learned by being penalised for lifting.
For language: targeted work on the specific recurring errors, not general grammar coverage. Most students make a small number of errors repeatedly, and identifying those three or four is worth more than a textbook.
On reading
Students who read do better, and there is no substitute. But when time is short, targeted practice moves marks faster than general reading — inference technique, summary discipline and register awareness are all trainable within a term.
The efficient position: targeted practice for the examination, sustained reading for the ceiling. A student who only drills will plateau; a student who only reads will keep losing marks to technique they were never taught.
The register checklist, concretely
Because register and format errors are the fastest losses to recover, it is worth having an actual procedure rather than an intention.
Before writing anything in situational writing, answer three questions in the margin:
Who is reading this? A principal, a company, a committee, a friend, a younger student. Everything else follows from this.
What do they need from it? To be informed, persuaded, warned, thanked, given instructions. The purpose decides the structure.
What form does that take? Letter, email, report, proposal, speech, article. Each has its own opening, its own sign-off, and its own conventions about how directly you may address the reader.
Then check the register against the answer. A formal reader wants full forms rather than contractions, measured vocabulary, and a certain distance. An informal reader wants the opposite, and a student who writes to a friend in the language of a report loses marks just as surely as the reverse.
The thirty seconds this takes is the highest-value time in the paper, because the mark for appropriate register is available before a single sentence of content has been written well or badly.
Inference: what the question is really asking
Comprehension losses concentrate here, so it is worth naming the question types that cause them.
“What does the writer suggest…” wants what the text implies but does not state. Quoting the line that contains the implication is not the answer; saying what it implies is.
“Why does the writer use…” wants the effect of a choice — what it makes the reader feel or understand — not a label for the technique.
“What does the phrase mean here?” wants the meaning in this context, which is frequently not the dictionary meaning. The words “here” and “in this context” are doing real work and are routinely skimmed.
“In your own words” means the marker is checking you understood rather than located. Lifting the phrasing, even accurately, usually earns nothing.
The common thread: each asks the student to do something with the text rather than find something in it. A child who is reading to locate will keep losing these marks regardless of how well they read.
What to ask a prospective tutor
- “After a couple of pieces, can you tell me whether my problem is register, content points, inference, summary or language?” A specific answer means diagnosis.
- “How do you teach inference?” Listen for a method applied to question types, not “read more”.
- “Will my writing be marked against the assessment criteria?” Marking against criteria is the mechanism that produces improvement; general encouragement does not.
Frequently asked questions
My child’s grammar is fine but English marks are poor. Why? Most likely register and format in situational writing, or inference in comprehension. Both are technique rather than language, and both respond faster than grammar work would.
Is reading more the answer? It raises the ceiling and it is slow. If the examination is near, targeted practice on inference, summary and register moves marks faster. Ideally do both.
Why does my child lose marks in comprehension when the answer is in the passage? Because the question asked for interpretation, not location. Copying a phrase containing the answer usually earns nothing — the mark is for explaining what it means or why it was written that way.
How important is oral? It carries real weight and is often left to chance. Reading aloud regularly and practising developed spoken answers is low-effort preparation that most students skip.
Can English marks improve quickly? Technique-driven losses — register, content points, summary — can move within a term. Language control and inference depth build more slowly because they rest on accumulated reading.
—